Hi Creatives! 👋
This week’s highlights all point to the same shift: generative tools are moving from “cool demo” territory into actual production pressure. You’re seeing it in three places at once:
Video that reads like coverage and editing choices, not a single awkward shot (the Spaghetti Benchmark with Seedance 2.0).
Image generation that thinks like a designer, with layout, hierarchy, and negative space in mind (Recraft v4 on Freepik).
Workflow tools that reduce blank-timeline pain, like rough cut assembly and last mile polish (Adobe Quick Cut, Magnific Video Upscaler).
The upside for creators: faster iterations, clearer pitches, and more room to explore. The catch: expectations rise just as quickly, especially around rights, provenance, and consistency.
This Week’s Highlights:
The Spaghetti Benchmark: from “AI slop” to “wait… that’s a real cut?”
Recraft v4 on Freepik: “design-ready” images, not just pretty ones
Adobe Firefly Video Editor “Quick Cut”
State of Generative Media (Vol. 1): 2025 was the year “production” caught up to “play”
Amazon MGM is testing in-house AI tools for film and TV production
AI Fan Edit: Rewriting the Stranger Things Finale Battle
The Spaghetti Benchmark: from “AI slop” to “wait… that’s a real cut?”
Remember when “Will Smith eating spaghetti” was the unofficial stress test for how broken AI video still was?
Now we’ve got the next chapter: “Will Smith fighting a spaghetti monster… epic action film scene… different cuts… 80s movie scene.” The point isn’t the celebrity prompt (more on that in a sec) — it’s that the output reads like edited coverage, not one awkward continuous shot.
Made with ByteDance’s Seedance 2.0
Made with ByteDance’s Seedance 2.0 (a new multimodal video model).
Seedance 2.0’s headline flex: it’s designed for multi-shot, cinematic-ish generation and can take text + image + video + audio as inputs, with “reference” controls (so you can guide it more like a director than a lottery player).
Why creatives should care (the practical version)
If you do any kind of pitching, pre-vis, concepting, or brand work, the interesting shift is:
Story rhythm is getting easier to prototype: “different cuts” is a big deal because timing and pacing are where ideas usually live or die.
Previs is starting to look like a real creative decision (camera language, beats, mood), instead of a proof-of-tech.
Audio-supported clips change how clients judge “rough drafts” — even simple sound makes something feel closer to a real spot or trailer.
The caution (please don’t build a client workflow on celebrity likeness)
A lot of viral tests use famous faces because it’s an easy yardstick. It’s also where legal + brand risk spikes.
If you’re testing the model:
Use original characters, your own footage, or licensed references
Treat it as concept / previs, then rebuild with cleared assets for anything commercial.
Read the full details here.
Recraft v4 on Freepik: “design-ready” images, not just pretty ones
AI Generated Image inside Freepik ( Recraft )
Recraft v4 is Freepik’s new image model aimed at a very specific pain point: images that look good and leave room for typography.
Instead of generating a scene that you have to fight in Photoshop just to place a headline, Recraft v4 is tuned to produce visuals with clear structure, balanced composition, and intentional negative space—the stuff designers care about when something needs to ship.
What’s different (in plain language)
Layout-aware outputs: more grid-friendly compositions and cleaner hierarchy, so your text overlays don’t feel like an afterthought.
More natural photorealism: better lighting/material feel, so results are closer to “usable” without heavy cleanup.
Two resolution options: v4 (1K) for day-to-day work, and v4 Pro (2K) when you need sharper detail.
When it’s actually useful
This is most helpful for:
Ads + social posts where you need space for copy
Posters / editorial covers that need hierarchy
Brand systems where you’re generating a set of visuals, not a one-off
Quick “try it without overthinking” workflow
Open Freepik’s AI Image Generator
Pick Recraft v4
Prompt like a designer: format + layout need + subject
Example: “Hero banner, clean negative space top third for headline, centered product shot, soft studio lighting…”
💡 Insight
Recraft v4 is part of a broader shift: image models are starting to compete on design utility, not just aesthetics. For creatives, that’s a real productivity gain, less time fixing compositions so they can hold typography.
The tradeoff: when tools deliver “layout-ready” faster, teams often expect more variations, faster approvals, and tighter brand consistency. The winners won’t just be people who can generate images—they’ll be the ones who can art direct with constraints (grid, hierarchy, brand rules, and usage rights) and keep the process from turning into endless options.
Magnific Video Upscaler
Here’s what it brings to the table for creators polishing AI or real footage:
Upscale up to 4K
3 presets + a custom mode (so you can dial in the look, not just “enhance everything”)
Turbo mode when you need speed
FPS Boost for smoother motion
1-frame preview to sanity-check results before spending credits
Why it matters: this is one of those “last-mile” tools that can make test renders, social edits, and AI clips feel more production-ready—without committing to a full post pipeline every time.
Adobe Firefly Video Editor “Quick Cut”
Credit to Adobe
If you’ve ever had a folder full of clips and that immediate “ugh, I have to find the story first” feeling, Adobe’s Quick Cut in the Firefly video editor (beta) is aimed at that exact moment.
Instead of starting from a blank timeline, Quick Cut automatically assembles an initial rough cut from the footage you upload, so you’re reacting to a draft rather than organizing chaos from scratch. It uses scene detection, shot selection, and audio analysis to pick cut points and pull “important” moments into a first pass, then you refine from there.
What you can do with it
Generate a first draft faster: Upload footage, get an initial cut, then trim, reorder, and polish.
Steer the edit with intent: Quick Cut can be guided by a text prompt plus adjustable settings.
Shape deliverables earlier: You can tweak preferences like aspect ratio, video duration, and even add a B-roll track during generation.
Creator pros (what’s in it for you) ✅
Less grunt work upfront: You spend less time scrubbing and more time editing decisions.
Better momentum: A rough cut helps you spot what’s missing early, like B-roll gaps or pacing issues.
Format-ready faster: Aspect ratio and duration controls matter if you’re cutting for socials.
Creator watch-outs (what to keep an eye on) ⚠️
“Best shot” is subjective: Auto selection can favor technical clarity over emotional timing, comedic beats, or intentional awkwardness.
Audio driven choices can skew the story: If your strongest moments are visual, audio analysis might underweight them.
Risk of sameness: If teams rely on first drafts too heavily, edits can start to look algorithmically “tidy” rather than creatively distinct.
💡Our Take
Quick Cut is a good signal of where editing is heading: AI is becoming the assistant editor that gets you to a workable timeline faster, but the creative advantage still comes from what you do after the draft appears. The upside is speed and fewer blank-canvas moments. The tradeoff is taste, because taste is the part that doesn’t autocomplete well. Creators who treat Quick Cut as a first pass generator, not a final decision-maker, will likely get the most value while keeping their voice intact.
Read the full details here.
State of Generative Media (Vol. 1): 2025 was the year “production” caught up to “play”
fal’s State of Generative Media: Volume 1 is a snapshot of how generative media shifted in 2025. The main point: it’s moving from “fun experiments” to real production workflows across image, video, audio, and 3D.
Key takeaways
Scale is the story. There isn’t one “winner model.” Teams are using a growing mix of tools, and they’re updating that stack often.
Image is slightly ahead of video in production use. Video adoption is growing fast, but it’s still harder to control and standardize at scale.
Organizations care about integration. Creatives may use apps, but companies increasingly want tools that fit into pipelines (often via APIs).
ROI shows up when the use case is specific. Strong results tend to come from clear goals like faster iteration, versioning for campaigns, and content variations for testing.
IP and ownership concerns are still the biggest brakes. Many teams want speed, but legal and brand risk questions can slow adoption.
What’s in it for creatives
More shots on goal: faster iterations, more concepts, more variations without blowing up budgets.
Better pre-production: quicker storyboards, pre-viz, pitch visuals, and campaign exploration.
New expectations: clients may want more options faster, plus clearer answers on rights and provenance.
Insight 💡
As generative media gets easier to produce, “good enough” becomes common. The creative edge shifts toward taste, direction, and consistency. The people who stand out won’t just be the ones who can generate assets, but the ones who can run a clean process: strong briefs, repeatable workflows, and responsible usage that clients can sign off on.
Read the full details here.
Amazon MGM is testing in house AI tools for film and TV production
Amazon MGM Studios is preparing to test in house AI tools designed to cut costs and speed up production workflows. A closed beta is planned for March 2026 with select industry partners, and the team expects to share early results by May 2026.
What they’re building
This effort is being run through a dedicated AI Studio led by Albert Cheng, set up like a small internal startup (engineers and scientists, with creative and business support). The tools are meant to slot into real production pipelines, focusing on practical bottlenecks like:
Character and continuity consistency across shots and scenes
Pre production + post production support (the parts that tend to eat time and budget)
Editing assistance to speed up iteration, while keeping humans in control
Amazon’s framing is that these tools are meant to support creators, not replace them—while acknowledging the broader industry anxiety around roles, labor, and expectations.
One example they highlighted
Amazon pointed to its series House of David, where AI enhanced footage supported the creation of large scale battle sequences in a more cost effective way.
Why this matters for creators
This is a shift from “AI as a novelty” to AI as pipeline infrastructure. If it works, it likely means:
More pressure for faster turnarounds on versions, edits, and deliverables
More value on creators who can run workflows + quality control (not just generate assets)
More urgency around credit, authorship, and accountability when AI touches editorial steps
Read full details here.
AI Fan Edit: Rewriting the Stranger Things Finale Battle
Chenran Ning shared a short experiment titled “Trying to Fix Stranger Things Finale Battle” — Episode 2, imagining Will, Eleven, and Eight vs. Vecna, made with Seedance 2.0.
The post is basically a “what-if” fan rewrite: using generative video to remix a well-known story beat, then asking the audience if they should keep going and finish the arc.
Why this is interesting for creatives
It’s a clean example of AI as a rapid “scene prototyping” tool (test a narrative idea fast, then iterate based on feedback).
The format doubles as community building: you’re not just posting a clip, you’re inviting viewers into the creative decision.
Watch-outs
Fan edits in popular IP can be a gray zone—fine for experimentation, but be careful if you plan to monetize or use it commercially.
“Made with X model” is helpful context, but it can also distract from story choices—so the edit still needs a clear creative intent.
Check the work here.
💡 Insight
The throughline this week is pretty blunt: making more content is getting easier. Standing out still comes from the decisions.
Here’s what that means in practice, based on this week’s mix of editing tools, studio pipelines, and fan-driven experiments:
Direction becomes the differentiator. Tools can assemble a first pass (Quick Cut) or generate multi shot sequences (Seedance 2.0), but the “why this cut, why this beat, why this frame” is still on you.
Design utility is the new competitive arena. Models like Recraft v4 aren’t only chasing prettier outputs, they’re chasing outputs that hold typography and ship in real layouts. That’s a real time saver, and it also raises the bar for brand consistency.
IP and likeness risk stays loud. Celebrity prompts and fan edits are handy benchmarks, but they’re also where legal and brand risk spikes. Treat them as experiments, rebuild with cleared assets for anything commercial.
That’s the week. Same tools arms race, same opportunity: use speed to buy more thinking time, not more chaos.
That’s it for this week, folks.
🔔 Stay in the Loop!
Did you know that you can now read all our newsletters about The AI Stuff Creators and Artist Should Know that you might have missed.
Don't forget to follow us on Instagram 📸: @clairexue and @moodelier. Stay connected with us for all the latest and greatest! 🎨👩🎨
Stay in the creative mood and harness the power of AI,
Moodelier and Claire 🌈✨
